hkdata.fairuse.org

Everything related to MakeMKV
Post Reply
ArnoldLayne
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 4:47 pm

hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by ArnoldLayne » Fri Nov 08, 2019 5:23 pm

Running makemkv this morning, having recently updated my malwarebytes to the new version, it flagged an outbound connection to hkdata.fairuse.org as a phishing event.
I allowed Malwarebytes to block the connection, twice.
The recording went well except upon playback I noticed this is no audio track.

Is this expected, have others seen it?
Thanks!

Woodstock
Posts: 6708
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 11:21 pm

Re: hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by Woodstock » Fri Nov 08, 2019 6:22 pm

Did it say what file it was trying to access on this host? hkdata.fairuse.org/svq/sdf.dat.gz seems to be the hash key file for MakeMKV, and the host name resolves to the same IP, 91.224.23.225, as the most recent host used for the HK file.
How to aid in finding the answer to your problem: https://www.makemkv.com/faq/item/8

mike admin
Posts: 3649
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:26 am
Contact:

Re: hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by mike admin » Fri Nov 08, 2019 11:07 pm

This is correct, this site hosts SDF/HK auto-updates for MakeMKV.

ArnoldLayne
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 4:47 pm

Re: hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by ArnoldLayne » Sat Nov 09, 2019 12:53 am

And if the access is blocked, the audio track is purposely not recorded?
Thanks

Woodstock
Posts: 6708
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 11:21 pm

Re: hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by Woodstock » Sat Nov 09, 2019 3:27 pm

No, if access were blocked, then you wouldn't be able to remove encryption from any new UHD disks. The Hash Key doesn't affect pulling audio tracks.
How to aid in finding the answer to your problem: https://www.makemkv.com/faq/item/8

nicolas
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 2:32 pm

Re: hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by nicolas » Fri Nov 29, 2019 3:15 pm

It also got blocked in here, beeing flagued as "Nudity and Risque"

d00zah
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:23 pm

Re: hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by d00zah » Fri Nov 29, 2019 3:39 pm

Got the 'blocked' notice last night. Knowing what the transaction was about, I added an exclusion. All's right with the world.

Observation: MBAM has been particularly aggressive w/ 'False Positives', of late. A scan flagged an old version of DaemonTools Lite (v4.49.1.0356), which has been on my system for ages with no apparent ill effects... seems to be the update check, as well. I'm comfortable with adding the exclusions. If you are not, report potential False Positives to MalwareBytes & they will make the determination.

Woodstock
Posts: 6708
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 11:21 pm

Re: hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by Woodstock » Fri Nov 29, 2019 3:52 pm

I almost think the aggressive nature of the scans is to make up for the fact that a lot of AV programs aren't as good as they used to be. Well, really, that the bad actors are better at hiding than the AVs are at finding.

I've got programs that have been on my drives longer than the companies have been in existence (think DOS 3.3 era) that are flagged as "infected" with things that didn't exist the last time the file was modified.

It's hard to get scared by a report of a 30K file being infected with a trojan that is 5 times that size...
How to aid in finding the answer to your problem: https://www.makemkv.com/faq/item/8

d00zah
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:23 pm

Re: hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by d00zah » Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:04 pm

It also has to do with domains like 'freeuse.org' which may have been used by less trustworthy entities (for updates, etc.) in the past. One bad apple... & they are all lumped in under the root domain. It's flagging the domain, not the file.

Also, the latest version of MBAM (v4.x) has just rolled out recently & there is 'fine-tuning' afoot...

Roger
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2016 6:09 pm

Re: hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by Roger » Mon Dec 30, 2019 9:18 pm

MBAM flagged this site for me but I had no audio problems with ripping four movies.

Billycar11
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:49 am

Re: hkdata.fairuse.org

Post by Billycar11 » Mon Dec 30, 2019 9:32 pm

Roger wrote:
Mon Dec 30, 2019 9:18 pm
MBAM flagged this site for me but I had no audio problems with ripping four movies.
it wouldn't cause audio problems it would cause disks you dont have the key for to not open

Post Reply