Midway

Please post here for issues related to Blu-ray discs
meanstreak
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2020 5:40 am

Re: Midway

Post by meanstreak » Thu Mar 05, 2020 3:07 am

retail3 wrote:
Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:16 am
Title information
Name: Midway
Source file name: 00539.mpls
Duration: 2:18:24
Chapters count: 16
Size: 36.3 GB
Segment count: 10
Segment map: 504,510,501,507,502,505,506,509,503,508
File name: Midway_t119.mkv

This worked for me!
Blu-Ray-DVD from Amazon

I have the retail Blu-Ray/DVD/Digital Copy I got from a local Walmart and this one appears to have worked correctly. Not had a chance to watch the entire thing yet but a check of the beginning and end credits plus a quick skip thorough looks like it's OK.

Krawk
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 12:10 am

Re: Midway

Post by Krawk » Thu Mar 05, 2020 8:56 pm

asr101 wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2020 4:54 pm
Thanks - this is just what I needed - MakeMKV Java routine picked the wrong source file.
Does Mike view such threads/fix this issue in new releases?
I always fear that no matter how old the disc is, unless he does, it will be the wrong playlist. (LionsGate eat a dick)

tinkerer
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2020 2:41 am

Re: Midway

Post by tinkerer » Sun Apr 12, 2020 2:49 am

ChrisCaPWN wrote:
Mon Feb 17, 2020 12:00 am
I manually went through to find the correct playlist for rental discs. I found it to be 00741.mpls.


Enjoy.
This was my experience with Redbox...same mpls and track 158, however, the segments were: 507,501,509,502,504,510,508,506,503,505

Thanks for the input!

kfreeb
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: Midway

Post by kfreeb » Sat Apr 18, 2020 8:08 pm

Here's what I found on the Retail disc I purchased:
UPC code: 3139831414
Attachments
Screen Shot 2020-04-18 at 2.06.25 PM.png
Screen Shot 2020-04-18 at 2.06.25 PM.png (26.31 KiB) Viewed 2948 times
Mac Pro 3.33GHz Intel Xeon 12 core (mid 2012)
64GB Memory
Mac OS X 10.12.6
Internal Blu-ray drive: BD-RE WH14NS40
MakeMKV v1.15.1

chicken007
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 5:35 pm

Re: Midway

Post by chicken007 » Tue May 12, 2020 12:31 pm

Hi am running v1.15.1 and trying to rip Midway UK version, but it skips all the various files showing segment maps and assumes it is a file...
shows this message

Title 00998.mpls is equal to title 00000.mpls and was skipped
Title 00998.mpls(1) is equal to title 00000.mpls and was skipped
Title 00998.mpls(9) is equal to title 00000.mpls(10) and was skipped
Title 00998.mpls(15) is equal to title 00000.mpls and was skipped

What is happening anyone know?

Jeddia
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:10 pm

Re: Midway

Post by Jeddia » Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:16 am

Current build is tagging 00093 as Main Feature on the Netflix disc. Someone earlier stated 00741. Just wondering if anyone can confirm?

zelmo73
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:15 am

Re: Midway

Post by zelmo73 » Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:20 am

I just bought the 4K UHD version and I'm making a backup copy of the 1080p blu ray that came with Midway on my external hard drive that is plugged into my TV. This is the tag that I'm getting on the blu ray in MakeMKV:

Title information
Name: Midway
Comment: FPL_MainFeature
Source file name: 00724.mpls
Duration: 2:18:24
Chapters count: 16
Size: 36.3 GB
Segment count: 10
Segment map: 506,507,509,505,502,501,504,510,503,508
File name: Midway-FPL_MainFeature_t12.mkv



Should I go with the Main Feature or has anybody else come across this and had it not work for them?

Hoss713
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:28 pm

Re: Midway

Post by Hoss713 » Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:35 pm

Jeddia wrote:
Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:16 am
Current build is tagging 00093 as Main Feature on the Netflix disc. Someone earlier stated 00741. Just wondering if anyone can confirm?
I don't think it's correct. I got the same tagging as you, but the resulting video does not start at the correct scene. 00741 appears to be the correct.

brian163
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:25 pm

Re: Midway

Post by brian163 » Fri Jul 10, 2020 7:00 pm

Just got bit by the "MakeMKV Java routine" issue myself. I should have double checked it but it did not label the correct main feature segment. :oops: :(

Thanks @Hoss713 for the additional info.

Post Reply